This two-day training discusses how to best represent clients with convictions in immigration court.
This Practice Alert summarizes the Barton decision and briefly describes its potential impact on cancellation eligibility. A more in-depth Practice Advisory about Barton and its implications in immigration cases is forthcoming.
In early 2020, the Trump Administration began implementing a multi-pronged effort to collect DNA samples from immigrants to be used by federal and state law enforcement authorities to investigate crimes. Beginning April 8, 2020, the U.S. Department...
Historically, denaturalization was pursued by the U.S. government in very small numbers, averaging only eleven cases per year between 1990 and 2017.2 However, under the Trump administration there has been a dramatic increase in the number of...
This practice pointer provides a background on Castillo-Perez, explains the good moral character requirement of non-LPR cancellation, and clarifies the practical implications of the decision. The practice pointer also suggests arguments limiting the...
In this advisory, we review the Supreme Court’s decision in Dimaya (see Section I) and what the decision may mean for others charged with other similarly nebulous removal grounds (see Section II). We also discuss suggested strategies and provide a...
With the Trump Administration adopting harsh anti-immigrant policies and the Attorney General Jeff Sessions prioritizing immigration-related prosecutions, there is growing concern that federal law enforcement could expansively interpret the criminal...